Court backs dismissals under TUPE rules during insolvency

Posted on 15 Mar 2023
Share Blog Post

Harris & Co chartered accountants Northampton report that a new Court of Appeal ruling has made clear that administrators who dismiss employees before the sale of an insolvent business are not judged to be acting unfairly under the rules governing TUPE, opening the way for staff numbers to be reduced if necessary to keep a business going until sold.

The ruling follows a case heard by the Court of Appeal involving employees of Crystal Palace football club. When the club went into administration in January 2010, the administrator sought to sell it as a going concern. In May of the same year the administrator found the club had severe cashflow problems and decided to ‘mothball’ the club for some months in the hope that a sale could be achieved at a later date.

As a result, four of the club’s administrative staff were made redundant. Their claim for unfair dismissal was originally turned down, and they then brought a case at an employment appeal tribunal (EAT).

The EAT decided that the dismissals were automatically unfair under TUPE rules which state that a dismissal for a reason connected with a transfer of a business will be an automatically unfair dismissal unless the employer demonstrated that the dismissal took place for an economic, technical or organisational (ETO) reason entailing changes in the workforce.

The EAT took the view that in the Crystal Palace case the ETO defence did not apply since the dismissals were ‘part and parcel of a process, with the purpose of selling the business’, rather than for reasons connected with continuing to conduct the business.

The subsequent Court of Appeal ruling reverses this decision.

Richie Alder, employment partner at law firm Trowers & Hamlins said: ‘Administrators of insolvent companies will be breathing a sigh of relief, as this decision provides them with scope to dismiss staff in order to keep the business afloat until a buyer can be found – without these dismissals being found to be automatically unfair.’

View more blog posts

HMRC Brief 29/13
Posted on 14 Mar 2023

HMRC Brief 29/13

Brief sets out HMRC's position following decision by the Court of Appeal in the case of ITV Services Ltd
Continue reading
Continue reading
Employment Tribunals
Posted on 13 Mar 2023

Employment Tribunals

An employee can just bring a claim that has no basis the employer has to fork out legal fees that you then cannot recover from your employee
Continue reading
Continue reading
Workplace pension provider loses 1.4m to fraud
Posted on 10 Mar 2023

Workplace pension provider loses 1.4m to fraud

Significant control failure sees workplace pension provider hit by fraud
Continue reading
Continue reading
DB pensions lose protected status in insolvency
Posted on 09 Mar 2023

DB pensions lose protected status in insolvency

Provisions put in place by Pensions Regulator have lost protected status following Supreme Court ruling
Continue reading
Continue reading
whatsapp
Back To Top
01604 660661